Intersections
DispatchesPoetryProjectsAbout
DispatchesPoetryProjectsAbout
Back to articles

Neural Networks and the Hard Problem of Consciousness

March 15, 2024
1 min read
Neural Networks and the Hard Problem of Consciousness

The relationship between neural networks—both biological and artificial—and consciousness remains one of the most profound mysteries in science and philosophy. As we develop increasingly sophisticated artificial neural networks, we're forced to confront fundamental questions about the nature of subjective experience.

The Hard Problem

David Chalmers famously distinguished between the "easy problems" of consciousness (explaining cognitive functions and behaviors) and the "hard problem" (explaining why there is subjective experience at all). While neuroscience has made remarkable progress on the easy problems, the hard problem remains stubbornly resistant to empirical investigation.

Neural Correlates of Consciousness

Modern neuroscience has identified various neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs)—brain states and processes that correlate with conscious experience. The global workspace theory, proposed by Bernard Baars and developed by Stanislas Dehaene, suggests that consciousness arises when information becomes globally available to multiple cognitive systems.

Artificial Neural Networks

As artificial neural networks grow in complexity, some researchers wonder whether they might develop forms of consciousness. However, most current AI systems lack the integrated information and recursive self-modeling that theories like Integrated Information Theory (IIT) suggest are necessary for consciousness.

The Integration Challenge

The key challenge is understanding how distributed neural activity gives rise to unified conscious experience. This "binding problem" affects both our understanding of biological consciousness and our ability to assess whether artificial systems might be conscious.

Implications for AI Ethics

If we cannot definitively determine whether artificial systems are conscious, we face serious ethical challenges. How should we treat systems that might have subjective experiences? What moral status should we assign to potentially conscious AI?

Conclusion

The study of neural networks—both biological and artificial—continues to illuminate the mechanisms underlying cognition while simultaneously highlighting how much we still don't understand about consciousness itself. As our technology advances, these questions will only become more pressing.

Topics

NeurosciencePhilosophyAI Ethics & Governance
Read more articles
INTERSECTIONS

About

Intersections is Shan Rizvi's notebook of open letters, peace architecture, and technical lab notes. The essays move between heads-of-state diplomacy, semantic graph memory design, and the mystical traditions that still inform modern governance.

Each piece is an attempt to weave neuroscience, theology, and emerging AI into strategies that make reconciliation and human-centric intelligence feel actionable.

Connect

Subscribe to receive new letters, research dispatches, and project updates.

© 2025 Intersections. All rights reserved.

LinkedInXInstagram